MORE HATE MAIL
HATE MAIL HOME
|
 |
From: WhosGotTheRemedy@aol.com
Subject: (no subject)
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:12:31 EDT
hey, just so you know, the ex president of iraq is spelled "saddam". the 7 foot towel head, god of the left, is spelled 'osama', and the terrorist organization he leads is spelled 'al qaeda'.
|
From: Rob
Subject: WOW!
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 08:06:35 -0400
I don't think I've seen anybody rely so heavily on allegations and speculation without proof.
Please explain to us what is so unethical about a citizen gambling with their own money. Wouldn't
you be more worried about casino's giving out private information about your winnings or losings?
Can't you do better than Bennett's so-called racist remarks? How about the race baiting the
liberals have engaged in since hurricane Katrina. Wouldn't you say that was far more racist
especially since they don't clear up their remarks immediately like Bennett did?
It's so funny watching leftists whine about Halliburton, but it was o.k. for lord BJ to give them
"no-bid" contracts. Besides, who else would do it? The French owned Schlumberger? Would you rather
the French profit off Iraq rebuilding or hurricane recovery? Further, would you have preferred that
the government take a couple of months while they go through the bidding process? I also like the
way the left casually leaves out the fact that Halliburton has been working with the federal
government for the last 50 years, but then to acknowledge that would sorta deflate your agenda, wouldn't it?
|
From: Lee Pickett
Subject: none
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 16:33:08 -0500
Hi! Just checked down the page to see if you are still here, and you are! I'ts a shame you are wasting bandwidth on
the drivel you purvey, but it's a free country and I'm glad that we all have free speech, first amendment and all that.
I still listen to Rush as I have for about fifteen years now. He is great and he is RIGHT! There are a lot of conservatives
like me out in cyberland and in the words of Shania Twain, "you don't impressa me much". Have a nice conservative day.
Lee
Reply to Lee
Well hello there Lee,
I am used to conservatives dismissing facts which undermine the mindless GOP dogma they follow as "drivel". But hey, it is a free country and you are free to run around blindly following and idolizing entertainers as much as you like.
You have failed.
MEGADITTOS!!!
(ps... bandwidth is flowing massively.. don't you worry about that... Al Gore's invention sure is great eh?)
|
From: Paul Polito
Subject: none
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 20:04:04 -0400
instead of making ridiculous, false lies about Rush you should learn how to spell. This probably due to your Liberal education you moron.
Reply to Paul
Well hello there Paul,
I thought it was the liberals who are out there name calling. Say, why don't you learn how to think? Here is a chance for you to start. You make the accusation of "false lies". Read these articles and point out the "false lies"...
Limbaugh Lies to Troops
GOP Ethics
Lies in the Limbaugh Letter
Face it Paul, you are emotional and bitter becuase we don't hold your idol in high esteem. Displaying facts which are counter to Limbaugh's assertion also challenges the benefit which you think you derive from being a follower of GOP dogma.
You have failed.
MEGADITTOS!!!
|
From: JOHN PAULEY
Subject: your site
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2005 17:53:30 -0400
i just wanted to say how very sorry i am for you to live with so much hate inside. why are you so afraid of the truth? try to enjoy life more and put your tallent to good use.
if you ask him, God will free you from this hate.
|
From: reggaesoldier@wavecable.com
Subject: really?
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 11:33:54 -0700
You've devoted your time to an entire website hating rush limbaugh? He must be right.
Reply to "reggaesoldier"
Here you are saying you don't really know that Rush is right. Instead of a reasoned conclusion, you assert that because this is a parody
of Limbaugh's site, he "must be right". Clearly, logic is not your strong suit. BTW, instead of advancing thoughtless assertions, I suggest
you engage in fact gathering and objective thinking.
You have failed.
|
From: Jimmy
Subject: Too bad he's right
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 21:56:17 -0700
Listen to Michael Savage. Even worse than Rush. Or, better than Rush in my opinion. Its'
so funny because you DON"T support the troops, you DON"T care about family values, you
DON"T value, treasure and uphold the constition and civil rights the way they were intended.
The list goes on and on and on. Why else would you want God removed from the pledge of
allegiance? Or the pledge removed altogether? Why else would a known communist anti-american
scum like Ruth Ginsberg be upheld and praised in the media? Why else would commie Boxer and
commie Fienstien vote against Roberts? Because they know what he stands for, that's why.
Unfortunately, you liberals prove all the stereotypes are true by your own actions and
rehearsed phrases. You stand for everything I am against. You're just still mad because
your idiot, no-platform, no-issue, no-idea, no-reason-to-vote-FOR-him candidate lost. Whiners.
|
From: Michael A. Cuttler
Subject: the failure of the Liberal's welfare system
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 00:00:06 -0400
You believe to be "a humanitarian" is to enslave people who have the
capability of supporting themselves to eternal state welfare. In
reality you are a member of the slave owning class.
|
From: Matt H.
Subject: RUUUUSSSHHH
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 01:17:46 +0000
I am a huge Rush fan. However, I am not writing to bash your site. I am writing to ask you some serious questions. All questions will be in bold font.
By definition, in order to be the #1 rated talk-radio personality, one needs to be listened to by more people than any other talk-radio personality.
Since Rush is #1, I find it odd that you claim he is "out of touch with the American people." Question 1: If Rush is so out of touch, why do you think
he is so popular? (note: claiming that he is popular because he "speaks to the loyalists" WILL make you look stupid because that will put on display the
fact that conservative "loyalists" make up a majority of the people)
Question 2: Why do you purport that no one should listen to Rush because he is an evil and hate-filled man by starting your own hate website?
I noticed that you have a lot of "anti-Bush" and "anti-GOP" material on your website. You people have made it quite clear that you hate Bush and
Republicans and all of that
Question 3: So...now what? Bush can never run for office again; what is your plan for the future? (I challenge you to not refer to Bush, Republicans,
Conservatives, or anyone affiliated with the right-wing. We'll stipulate for the moment that all Republicans have done everything wrong. I want your plan only!)
I'm offering you the chance to prove to a Rush fan that he (Rush) is wrong! According to Rush, the best way to destroy liberalism is to let liberals be heard. If you
really believe that Rush is wrong you will answer the questions and Americans will see that you have a vision, and that Rush is incorrect in his beliefs. I do not
think that you will even attempt to meet my challenge, thus, I will be impressed if you even post this e-mail (let alone respond publicly). Good Luck.
Matt H
Repy to Matt H.
Ok .. as you wish. Here are your answers along with links to supporting content where it provides confirmation of a given point. You are welcome to actually read the content of this site and ponder instead
of immediately reacting negatively because it doesn't hold up Rush in high esteem. So doing would help you to avoid some of these questions in the future. Anyway, here goes...
#1: First of all, in order for what you are asserting to be true, it would have to be that “loyalists” make up the majority of the American people. I doubt you have actually thought much about that.
Clearly, nowhere near half of the public are Rush listeners. Not even half of the voting public identify themselves as republicans. Saying that the majority of Rush listeners are “loyalists” does not make anyone “look stupid”.
It is a fair characterization and one that you offered. Limbaugh’s show is political pornography. Most of what he says amounts to leveling unfounded attacks and telling outright falsehoods. Here are
some examples to back up this statement of fact…
Lying to Troops in Afghanistan
Oil Prices
Liberals Hate Bush More than Terrorists
The Limbaugh show is not about reasoned debate. To large extent, listeners tune in to have what they think are their views confirmed through having their “enemies” attacked. Who else but a “loyalist”
would tune into that hour after hour? In regard to numbers, millions of people smoke cigarettes each day. Does that mean smoking is good?
#2: Limbaugh tells outright lies and misleads people into holding some ideas that aren't true. It is that simple. We don't hate the constitution. We don't hate America. We don't love the terrosists. We don't want soliders
in Iraq to get killed. We don't want the country to fail. And on and on. Yet many who trust Limbaugh come to think these assertions are true.
This is a parody site. Not sure what that is? Ask Rush. Parody is a big component of his show and his web site. In regard to “hate”, that is what Rush is selling.
Anyone who doesn’t go along with GOP dogma is a worthless, terrorist loving, America hating subversive, even those of us who proudly served in the military but think invading
Iraq was foolish as is cutting taxes and increasing spending thus giving China more leverage over us. The “hate” these days is coming from the right. Dittohead "loyalists" run around robot like insisting the
"hate" speech is all on liberals yet tune in hour after hour, day after day listening to Limbaugh spit out hateful, divisive speech.
Here are examples of Rush’s hate speech…
They Hate Ware Heroes
Attack on Ted Kennedy (again)
Rush Limbaugh on Indians
#3:in brief… Roll back the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy and stop creating conditions which lead to China having more leverage over us. Do not invade countries
which do not have WMD, operational ties to Al Queada and militaries incapable of invading its neighbors. Actually work with our allies instead of alienating them. Let them
take part in decision making processes when invading countries that even a moron could predict would be a quagmire if invaded. So doing helps them to become engaged thus taking
at least some of the burden off of us. Engage them now and not in a token way. Endeavor to put real diplomats in positions which involve fostering postive relations with our allies.
Vigorously pursue conservation and alternative energy sources. Don’t give massive loot and booty to large wealthy corporations particularly
when we face massive budget shortfalls. Worker protection. Personal freedom. Environmental protection. Effective domestic security and emergency response. Effective border protection.
Transparent government.
To ask, "prove Rush is wrong" requires there to be one thesis advanced by Rush. "Rush is right" is nothing more than a slogan which packages a nebulous empty vessel and easy to cite
phrase for marketing purposes. Devout listeners then go ahead and place into it what they wish it to be. Rush is not about debate or reasoned analysis. It is about telling a sub-set of the
radio audience the type of things they wish to hear and of course, selling air time.
I welcome you to spend some to reading at this site and engaging in objective, reasoned consideration of the facts it presents. Here is a good place to start...
refuting Rush
MEGADITTOS!!!!
|
|
 |
